Showing posts with label Free software. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Free software. Show all posts

September 15, 2011

This saturday is Software Freedom Day!

Celebrate SFD with us on September 17!
409 events spread in 84 different countries, Software Freedom Day 2011 is approaching!

Join a local SFD team - Is there a SFD event nearby?

Software Freedom Day is an event with hundreds of teams from all around the world running local events to help their communities understand Software Freedom. One way of joining SFD is to join an existing SFD event. Check to see if there is already a team registered in your area. If there is one, you can always join them and help them to make their events successful. It's FUN to join SFD!

Helps are always in need to organize SFD :) you can help to design marketing materials, spread the words out, decorate the venue, take photos, demonstrate or present about Free Software in the event, etc. Feel free to check out the team map to find the SFD team in your local area!

As usual, ANSOL is organizing the event in Portugal, this time in Lisbon. Here's the schedule for the day's events (sorry, only in Portuguese):

What are you waiting for? Check out where's the nearest place to you where a celebration is happening, and join the free software community to celebrate or to know a little more about what's all this about!

February 01, 2011

My Top 10 albums of 2010

As some of you might know, I have a tiny record label called Noori Records, besides being a musician in the musical projects Merankorii and kokori.

So, Noori Records is celebrating the change of year by asking its artists to do their "top 10 of 2010" lists, and I've done mine there too. Here's the quick list (read the article for some kind of review and more information about each record):

  • 20th March 2010 (2xCD, Cabinet Pin)
  • Sol Invictus – The Bad Luck Bird (7”, Auerbach Tonträger)
  • Antimatter – Alternative Matter (3xCD + DVD + Book, Prophecy Productions)
  • V/A – Whom The Moon A Nightsong Sings (2xLP or 2xCD, Auerbach Tonträger)
  • DVAR – El Mariil (CD, Shadowplay Release)
  • Kokori – init() (EP, A Beard Of Snails Records)
  • V/A – Now That’s What I Call Retro-Futurism Vol. 1 (2xFloppy, Diskette Etikette Rekords)
  • +ko+ko+ – Ovo (Single, Witte Dood Records)
  • +ko+ko+ – Parasite (Single, Witte Dood Records)
  • V/A – Maere Compilation
On a completely different matter, if you're in Portugal (and since I doubt I'll get back blogging soon) check out this events going on really soon now:
KDE 4.6 release party, next saturday afternoon;
Debian Squeeze release party, next saturday night (gives time to go to both parties);
Portuguese Talkers dinner 2011 (19 years!)

October 19, 2010

Mamnuts and PyTalker are dead, long live TZMud!

I had several choices, really. I could choose to undertake the huge task of fixing Mamnuts (actually throwing away most of the underlying NUTS-inherited code), but it was simply too much work. Or I could take PyTalker by the horns and just make its idea work - which had an estimated amount of man-hours quite inferior to the first option. But... what about maintaining and expanding it afterwords? One of the issues with PyTalker would be that, as soon as a working version was released, I would have to work on implementing each feature Mamnuts had, to be able to have a convincing argument against the usage of Mamnuts, leaving to the side the only unarguable preference: the common "but I prefer C to Python!" (and, really, there's lots of people saying that in the talkers world, imagine that!). I hoped to find a good team to do the job with me, but others would find even less time than me to dedicate to the job. It wouldn't work. Sigh. Well, I would have to do it by myself... with the use of nice Python frameworks. And, while looking at those and who contributed to what, I just saw that there was a third, quite more interesting option: get back to the origins - now without configurability limitations - and assume once and for all that a talker is a kind of MUD with certain particularities. And so, the best way to deal with my issue was, really, find out the best configurable, well-maintained, clean, active, secure, with a nice community MUD codebase, and try to just add the configurable options needed to turn a MUD codebase into a "MUD/Talker codebase", or, in fact, a MUD with a configuration option that would let you set it up to behave like your typical talker, with just something like

allow_utf8 = True
speechmode_default = True
talkmode = True
Now, guess what... that's exactly what you need to do to turn the MUD codebase "TZMud" into a talker. That's right: TZMud is a server to host a multi-user domain (MUD) in the tradition of LPMud, but implemented in the Python programming language, and, since it's 0.9 version, with a configurable option to turn it into a NUTS-like talker.

This is also, obviously, the time to say goodbye to PyTalker and Mamnuts. Don't be sad: you'll be probably able to find me lurking on the TZMud project. And, most importantly, if you're planning on running a talker (or running one already), switch to TZMud. It lacks lot's of features, that's for sure, but that is easily fixed: just open a ticket asking for what you're missing. Feel free to contribute with code, if you can, the project maintainers are quite open and happy to review/accept your code.

This is the last blog post on Mamnuts' website.

July 03, 2008

HOWTO install HedgeWars (Worms clone) in an EEE PC

hedgewars screen shot
HedgeWars is a "Worms" clone and a pretty cool game. They put it this way:
Hedgewars, it's a Blast! This is the funniest and most addictive game you'll ever play - hilarious fun that you can enjoy anywhere, anytime. Hedgewars is a turn based strategy game but the real buzz is from watching the devastation caused by those pesky hedgehogs with those fantastic weapons - sneaky little blighters with a bad attitude!
By popular demand, here's a (quick and simple) HOW TO of how to install this game on an EEE PC (where it runs awesomely):
  • Edit your /etc/apt/sources.list, and add this line in that file:
deb http://www.backports.org/debian etch-backports main contrib non-free
  • In a terminal (CTRL+ALT+T to open it) write:sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install hedgewars
  • Edit once again the /etc/apt/sources.list file and remove the new entry, so your system ends up as it was before
  • in the terminal write sudo apt-get update to make your changes in the sources list being in effect.
  • Now you have the game installed. To run it, in a terminal write hedgewars. To play it well, you'll have to set it up to fullscreen mode.
There you go: have a nice gaming!

May 12, 2008

Tidbits


Whom rights?



If you're an interested in the developments of the music industry like I am, you'll bump into the sentence "rights of content owners" countless times. 10,200 is the number given by Google if you search for that term. Which doesn't cease to scare me, because people are really serious about talking about it. Shouldn't they be talking about authors rights instead?

Merankorii's new CD



Talking about music, I just announced in Merankorii's blog that Merankorii's 6th release is getting out tomorrow. This is going to be a limited edition CD split with two other bands: Ancestral and Njiqahdda. A new track from the album can already be downloaded from <Merankorii's MySpace, following Merankorii's one free track per month inniciative.

NIN, Radiohead, ColdPlay...



And this leads me to another thing I was planning to blog about for quite a long time. Some people ask me, knowing my thoughts about music 2.0, the fact that I have a musical project and a micro-label, why don't I "go free". Well, going free is great. I'm a heavy supporter of free music. I have lots of music freely available, all my tracks are licensed with Creative Commons but one - that is in Public Domain. Yet, there are things you can do and things you can't. See, some people sometimes tell me that "it's hard to have a band" or that "it's hard to have a label". No - I think that they're wrong. Having one of those has never been easier. But when you say that "my band drains all my money" I have to argue that, well, probably you aren't managing it the right way. See, NIN (above all, Radiohead and ColdPlay experiments can't measure against Nine Inch Nails in terms of concept exploration and free music money making) have the means (number of "true fans", number of listeners, awareness, carreer, investment budget,...) to do what they do, the way they do. I don't take Trent Reznor any credit for being so: I'm convinced that if he hadn't those means he would manage to do what he wanted to anyway. But doing things "the NIN way" works if you're NIN, won't probably work if you're not. So, each Noori Records release works its own way, and the same thing applies to Merankorii. Surely: I could give all Merankorii music for free, earn from ads and tips. But then I couldn't manage to have profit (which gives me increasing financing budget for both the band and the label) while making physical releases, and both me and some of Merankorii's fans wouldn't be happy without those. For those that think that music must be free, that want Merankorii's tracks but not pay for them, well, they'll have'em anyway, but one track per month. Also, when you have "pay as you want" albums and you can buy the music for a price from $1 to $20 USD, you'll only have to spend a couple of dollars if you're really in a hurry.

Free Software



To end this blog post, and keeping the talk on "Free", I'll end leaving you with a great letter that I'll resume as "Free Software - making the world a better place".

March 27, 2008

Open Letter To NVIDIA

I'm all for Openess. In my last blog post I talked a little about Open Documents, this time I'm going to talk about something different: hardware. While it doesn't shock me that hardware plans are kept close and secret, I think that hardware specs should be allways open. Hardware specs is what will enable anyone to interact with the hardware you make and using all its features. A great example of why this is needed is NVIDIA: their graphics hardware don't have their specs open, and so the experience of using their hardware in systems like GNU/Linux are far from perfect. To convince NVIDIA to change their policy, there's an Open Letter to NVIDIA, saying:

We the GNU/Linux community and the undersigned, kindly request that you, NVIDIA Corporation, increase your efforts in better enabling the open-source community to develop free software drivers for your graphics hardware. Your major competitors in this market, AMD/ATI and Intel, have not only supported the community in open-source driver development efforts but they are now openly releasing hardware programming documentation.

While we are grateful that your company provides one of the best closed-source graphics drivers for Linux, it is not without its problems and prevents many users from having a truly free software platform. You have shown an open-source passion in the past when dropping the nforce-net binary blob in favor of the community-spawned forcedeth driver for Ethernet support on your motherboard chipsets. There has been a rumor that you may be developing an open-source strategy for your graphics products, so if that is the case please let us know your true intentions. Even if you were only able to open a subset of your Linux driver, this still would show a sign of solidarity to the free software world.

We stand united under the name OpenTheBlob.com, but realize that legally it may be next to impossible to open-source the binary portion of your graphics driver due to patents and preserving some intellectual property in this competitive market. What we are, however, asking you for is to support the open-source community to the fullest extent possible. The open-source "nv" driver that you provide for X is an abhorrent disaster that is limited to 2D acceleration and doesn't come without its share of limitations and shrouded code. We look to NVIDIA for providing concise programming documentation to willing open-source developers that is not encumbered by Non-Disclosure Agreements or other legal restrictions.

There is an interested group of developers at hand that are willing to contribute towards an open 3D NVIDIA driver. The Nouveau developers are committed to these free software ideals to the extent that they have spent years reverse engineering your hardware without ever receiving any funds for this immense work, but rely upon community donations. An official open-source driver could complement your binary driver, in order to provide a better "out of the box" experience on many Linux distributions and satisfying the customers -- including corporate clients -- who mandate open-source software.

In a steadfast manner, we request knowing your true commitment to the GNU/Linux and open-source communities. For everyday that you stand by idle, your competitors are continuing to refine their open-source drivers and pushing out more documentation that is better enabling the open-source community. Please let us know what is going on and join the open-source community in this effort.

If you agree with this text, please consider signing this open letter.

January 11, 2008

Workshops Audiência Zero

You're in Portugal? Do you want to attend to some free software workshops in creative areas, with software like Blender, GIMP, Inkscape, Audacity, Ardour, and so on? Check out some of them for this first trimester of 2008 in Porto: http://www.audienciazero.org/cct

I missed the audio one in December, but I'll try to attend this time...

December 12, 2007

Congratulations!

Remember when I wrote about Portugal refusing to adopt Free Software [1]? Well, it seems that not every country is so dumb as this one, and as a matter of fact I want to congratulate Dutch people: in a simmilar effort their results were quite different [2]:

Using Open Source is not 'mandatory', but when a choice has to be made between closed source software and open source software which behaves equally, than the open source version should be choosen.


[1] - http://smallr.net/FOSS-in-Portugal
[2] - http://smallr.net/FOSS-in-Netherlands

October 09, 2007

ODF x OOXML in Lisbon's first Free Software Forum

Next Friday and Saturday we'll have in Lisbon [1] the "I Fórum de Software Livre de Lisboa", an event about Free Software.

Saturday, from 15:00 to 16:30, I'm going to chair a debate called "ODF x OOXML" were we'll focus on the following topics:
  • The need of a standard

  • The standard format creation process

  • The adoption process of a standard format

  • The importance of document formats to our future

  • ODF x OOXML - adopt which one?


For now we'll have the presence of ANSOL and SUN in the debate. I'm still trying to find out someone willing to participate in the debate who thinks that OOXML is what should be adopted. I'll write about that later, probably after the debate.

See you there!


[1] - http://www.softwarelivre.com.pt/ptematico.php

October 05, 2007

Free Software in the Portuguese Parlment


So, as I've wrote previously, today was the day where a proposal to deploy Free Software in the Portuguese Parliement was voted. I knew about it thanks to a document in a non-free format, knew the whole schedule for the day thanks to a document in a non-free format, read the entire proposal, made by Partido Comunista Português, in a document in a non-free format, assisted and recorded it thanks to a video stream in a non-free format, but I won't refrain my self to speak out freely my thoughts about it.

First of all, this is one of those matters that is important to a hell lot of people, and if I'm talking about this one because this is one matter that quite interests me, I have little doubt that most of the other things discussed in the Parliement matter to a hell lot of (different, perhaps) people. I have an advantage, tho: I'm what can be considered a techno-litered, someone who knows about computers and how to use them. Most people wouldn't "so easily" find the proposal, the date, the schedule, how to assist and even less record it as I did. "So easily" wasn't easy at all: as a matter of fact I think I had a lot of luck because the Parliement makes no efforts whatsoever to make this things public. After all, it's our money and freedom they're talking about.

The proposal was simple and well conceived. Make Free Software available in the Portuguese Parliement, so everyone could have the freedom to use it. Lessons on how to use the chosen Free Software to those interested in it. Start using free and open document formats so everyone (even out of the Parliement) could have free access to those documents. Research the benefits of a migration to Free Software from the "multiple choices" scenario, and debate the results one year later.

The result was "approval of proposal, with changes". The changes made the propose this: "Make Free Software available in the Portuguese Parliement, so everyone can have the freedom to use it".

Now, I don't know the kind of access each deputy has to his own terminal in the Parliement, but what I know is that if instead of this proposal someone just decided to install free software in its terminal, or, if they don't have the permission, if they asked their helpdesk to do so, they could have it without all this fuss. In other words, this "approval" does not approve anything, it's just them mocking with the Portuguese people. I wonder why the hell am I paying their salaries.

Giving them the choice but not teaching them how to use it is the same as not giving them the choice. Refusing to give free access to the Parliement documents by choosing to keep a close format (Microsoft's) instead of a standard one (ODF) is discriminating the Portuguese people who do not use that proprietary format. I have to add to this one that the affirmation from Partido Socialista stating that "everyone can access to our documents) was outrageous: most of all a statement of "we're voting on a matter we don't know nothing about". Refusing to research the benefits of a migration to Free Software is the same as missing the whole point. The proposal was "let's take a look to the options", refusing that is saying "shut up and be quiet".

Overall, this "approval" was no approval at all. It was a loud and clear "SHUT THE FUCK UP" to Partido Comunista Português. This is the Parliement we have here.

Thanks to PCP for raising the issue. Thanks to Ubuntu-PT, Porto Linux, ANSOL for trying to give some information (and CD's) to the deputies, even if that information was completely ignored.

September 26, 2007

Good news to Portugal

Good news to Portugal: next 4th of October, around 15:00, the Portuguese Parliament is going to debate and vote two iniciatives presented by PCP:
  • Aproove an iniciative called "Free Software in the Parliament";
  • Create the National Council for Information and Comunication Technologies.
If this is aprooved, then we will finally have some good news from the "Technological Plan" our government is pulling out...

May 23, 2007

Richard Stallman in Portugal, today and tomorrow

Richard Stallman from GNU is in Portugal and will be giving two presentations.


If you're interested in going, click in any of those links for more info.