OK, here's a "What the F**k?" for today:
- European Comission legits Microsoft Software Patents . WTF? I mean, you can't patent software in Europe , but you let Microsoft patents affect Europe? Where's the logic? The sentence the royalties for a worldwide licence including patents will be reduced from 5.95% to 0.4% - less than 7% of the royalty originally claimed is written as if there's something good about this, but as a matter of fact you can read this as "you have to pay for patent infringement or patent royalties to Microsoft in Europe, even if software patents aren't valid in Europe". I wonder what is going on in this guys heads...
- Portugal is going to have something called "Cartão do Cidadão", a "Citizen's Card", obligatory, that will replace out ID card among others. It seems that there's going to be a security conference in Portugal  where Accenture is going to talk about the Citizen's Card security scheme. Now, what puzzles me is VD's reaction on it  (VD was somewhat involved in the Citizen's Card project, BTW):
in one hand the Digital Card is a portuguese Government prime security project and in the other, a local consultant company (which acts as a contractor for the Government) will be addressing his first security details at a conference, or at least I hope, it will be just a mist of conjunctions and speculation, due to the project security details and particularitiesNow, if the security of this project is of such importance (as, I agree, it is) what's wrong about talking about the security scheme? Don't you trust it? Because if you don't than it would be better not to have the card... Are you defending security through obscurity ? I really hope not ...
 - http://tinyurl.com/yodduw
 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_patent#Europe
 - http://www.vantagem.com/VS07.pdf
 - http://lists.paradigma.pt/pipermail/tce/2007-October/000137.html
 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_through_obscurity
 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_through_obscurity#Arguments_against